He makes a couple of key points:
"Why has the Narrative of Science been co-opted in this way? Because it works. Because Science is the dominant religion, i.e. belief system in transcendent forces, in the West today."If you blindly believe that science works regardless of the outcome, you are even more of a mindless, religious drone than any of the people from the so-called Dark Ages.
"So why does this bug me so much? What’s the big deal about wrapping a political argument in the mantle of Economics in the same way that it used to be wrapped in the mantle of Catholicism? Isn’t this what powerful political and commercial interests have done since the dawn of time, drawing on some outside source of social authority to support their cause?You cannot expect to subvert science for political aims without destroying the credibility of science and dragging what was once a useful pursuit through the political filth, and in doing so creating the potential to utterly destroy civilization through one poor choice of those in power.
Part of the answer is that as a limited government, small-l liberal I’m on the losing side of this particular political argument. I believe that it’s crucial to allow everyone to be as stupid as they want to be in their personal economic decisions because a) economic vitality and growth in the aggregate requires plenty of individual mistakes and losers along the way (sorry, but it does), and b) the alternative – allowing or requiring government to make these decisions on our behalf – inevitably creates a terribly fragile system where a single poor decision can lead to permanent ruin."
"The other part of the answer is that using Science for political ends subverts its usefulness (as does using Religion for political ends … just ask Martin Luther). We lose something very important when we associate a particular social scientific hypothesis with a winning policy outcome or a losing policy outcome, and that’s the recognition that social science – particularly economic science – is never True or False, but only more or less useful depending on whatever it is in life that you value … your utility function."As much as I preach and believe in absolute truth, I also recognize humanity's inherent inability to see that absolute truth in full. Ultimately, we can only go on what we see and know, and knowing what we prefer is a recognition that cannot be foisted upon us by any backwards politician.